top of page

ETHICAL FRONTIERS OF PREDICTIVE POLICING

Predictive Policing lies at the intersection of innovation and law enforcement, which employs data-driven tactics to prevent criminal activity. With the onset of the digital revolution, it is now possible to predict potential criminal conduct using sophisticated algorithms. Despite the promises of safety and security, predictive policing raises moral questions to strike a balance between protecting individual rights and preventing illicit activities.

Predictive policing heavily relies on data as it provides the foundation for advanced algorithms designed to anticipate criminal behavior. Variables like sociodemographic and geographic data, criminal history records, and even social media activity form the basis of algorithms employed in the prediction and prevention of crime. This database undergoes complex analysis, which facilitates governments and law enforcement agencies to predict patterns and allocate necessary resources efficiently. 


The potential of predictive policing is mainly determined by the scope and the quality of the data acquired. The more comprehensive and transparent  the dataset, the more accurate the prediction will become. However, acquiring such personal data often raises ethical questions. 


The Ethical Conundrum of Collecting Personal Data and Storage

Organizations employ various methods to gather personal data, often without explicit consent from the individuals. This database is generally extracted from publicly accessible information like surveillance camera records, social

media platforms, and other sources. Some valid concerns brought up regarding this data aggregation are the concerns of potential abuse or inappropriate handling of sensitive information, as well as matters of privacy infringement. Incorporating variables like geographical indicators and social media amplify this to be a possibility of it being a potentially invasive dataset. 


When a large volume of data contains details about non-criminal, harmless behavior or activities, the moral significance of predictive policing tends to be minimized. Additionally, these datasets may promote existing prejudices in the collected data, leading to biased predictions of illegal activity. Social biases may result in discriminatory practices as a result of this. 


The moral complications of storing such sensitive data are also raised. Strict methods such as access controls and encryption are implemented to protect

personal identities and prevent unauthorized access. To ensure ethical storage, it is vital to abide by data protection laws and achieve transparency and accountability.



Citizens’ Rights in Data Protection 


Various countries have established regulations for data protection to ensure the morality of data acquisition for sensitive information. The European Union enacted regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),  which have proven to be milestones towards safeguarding personal privacy rights. The gathering, storing, and usage of this data are all governed by these laws. By demanding explicit consent for data gathering, enforcing stringent guidelines for data usage, and levying severe penalties for non-compliance, its main goal is to give people more control over their personal information. Any firm that handles the data of EU people, regardless of where they operate, is impacted by GDPR's wide extraterritorial reach.

India has also established a similar set of guidelines to strengthen its regulatory framework when it comes to the arena of data protection. The principles of international data privacy laws are reflected in India’s Personal Data Protection Bill (PDPB). This bill could be considered a parallel to the EU’s GDPR. The main aim of this bill is to control the way personal information is processed and establish strict regulations over government and private organizations in the way they gather, store, and use this data. While drawing inspiration from the GDPR, the PDPB is primarily concerned with developing guidelines for how public and private organizations should handle personal data. It presents sensitive personal data classifications and suggests data localization recommendations, requiring that some types of data be processed and stored exclusively in India. A strong emphasis is placed on the significance of transparency and consent when handling sensitive data. The PDPB gives people rights over their data by highlighting the laws for data protection. It gives people the right to correct, access, and erase their data from the records, and states clearly that explicit permission must be obtained before collecting discreet information. 


One significant distinction between the EU and India is how they handle penalties for noncompliance: the PDPB offers different penalty structures according to the severity of the violation, whereas the GDPR imposes fines based on a company's global turnover. Furthermore, while the PDPB stresses the idea of purpose limitation and storage limitation principles for data processing, the GDPR emphasizes a more explicit and affirmative consent mechanism.


Some other solutions to combat the ethical risk that comes along with predictive policing strategies can be developed. 

One of the solutions to maintain the ethical standards of predictive policing is constantly monitoring the various elements of the database, like digital footprint, weather patterns etc. This helps to ensure that the algorithms are accurate and comprehensive. 

Establishing Ethical standards for the algorithm is also necessary to correct and evaluate any potential biases or prejudices towards certain communities. This can be achieved by engaging the community in the predictive process.

Another benefit of community engagement is that it builds trust and creates transparency between the public and the organisation. The public can be involved in the process by creating a feedback mechanism, wherein inputs are received from the affected communities to refine the predictive methodologies. 

Another integral component of this framework are the law enforcement personnel who constantly engage with this data. It is vital to provide a comprehensive training program for them to ensure ethical handling of sensitive data, and optimum use of predictive technology. 


Striking a Balance between Security and Civil Liberties.


It is necessary to have a moral compass as technology continues to evolve the legal landscape. An ethical framework can be established by assessment and communication between policymakers, and civil rights activists to protect fundamental liberties while implementing predictive policing. The real success of predictive policing lies not only in its effectiveness but also in its ability to negotiate the moral minefield, wherein people's rights are upheld while envisioning a secure society. Undeniably, finding a delicate balance between these two will require steadfast commitment, time, and vigilant adherence to moral values. 


119 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page